For millions of Americans who depend on food assistance to get by, Friday night brought another cruel twist. The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked an order that would have forced the Trump administration to restart full payments under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program โ better known as SNAP.
The ruling came after days of confusion, frustration, and fear. Across the country, families who rely on those benefits have been calling hotlines and visiting food banks, only to hear that funds have run dry. Itโs the first time in the 61-year history of SNAP that payments were disrupted nationwide.
Earlier this week, a federal judge had ordered the Trump administration to immediately release the money owed to states. He said the government had failed to fix its own mistakes and warned that โpeople will go hungryโ if nothing was done.
But within hours of that decision, the administration rushed to appeal. By late Friday, they took their case all the way to the Supreme Court โ and won a temporary freeze. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson signed the order allowing the government to hold off on making full payments while the legal fight continues.
For families waiting on help, it means another week โ or maybe longer โ of uncertainty.
Adding to the chaos, the Department of Agriculture told states it would โbegin the processโ of sending out benefits, even as the administrationโs lawyers were asking the courts to stop those very payments. That mixed message left governors scrambling to figure out what to tell their residents.
California Governor Gavin Newsom said food benefits had โbegun flowing again,โ but warned that many families still hadnโt received anything. In New York, Governor Kathy Hochul announced the state would cover the gap itself. โPresident Trumpโs actions have been senseless and un-American,โ she said. โIโll never stop fighting for New Yorkโs families.โ
The stakes couldnโt be higher. More than 42 million Americans โ roughly one in eight households โ depend on SNAP to buy food. The average benefit is just $188 per person each month, or about $6 a day. Even a short delay can mean empty fridges and skipped meals.
Food banks are already seeing lines grow longer. Many say theyโre running out of supplies after trying to fill the gap left by the federal freeze. โThis is not sustainable,โ one pantry director in Philadelphia said. โWeโre seeing people who have never come here before.
The Trump administration insists itโs simply following budget rules, arguing it doesnโt have legal authority to spend beyond whatโs left in emergency funds. Critics say thatโs an excuse โ and that politics, not law, is driving the delay.
Judge Jack McConnell, who issued the original order to restore funding, was blunt: โPeople have gone without for too long. Not making payments to them for even another day is simply unacceptable.โ
The case will now return to the appeals court. But for millions of low-income families, that process could take weeks. Each passing day means more worry, more waiting, and more meals missed.
Featured image via Youtube screengrab
This is power politics without consent
Trump keeps his birthday party and crowd
Same drama different election season
Leadership should calm, not incite panic
Nobel turned into bargaining chip, not honor
Free speech tested in real time