President Trumpβs months-long campaign of aerial strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean has already been steeped in controversy. Dozens killed, 21 confirmed strikes, and constant questions about legality. But this week delivered a new twist β one that even the administration seems to be struggling to spin.
And it starts with a brag.
Just hours after Trump himself shared footage of a strike that killed 11 alleged traffickers, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth went on Fox & Friends sounding like a man who wanted credit.
βI watched it live,β he said proudly, almost like a commentator talking about a touchdown instead of a lethal military operation.
He emphasized how βpreciselyβ the mission unfolded. How they βknew exactly who was in that boat.β How the target was linked to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. And how the message to the region was simple: try trafficking drugs, and you βface the same fate.β
The strike itself had already raised eyebrows. But it got significantly worse when reports revealed that two survivors β yes, survivors β were later killed.
Thatβs when the political temperature shifted.
The focus wasnβt just on whether the operation was legal. It was now on whether someone in Washington specifically ordered the killing of people who were no longer an active threat.
The early reporting pointed directly at Hegseth.
And suddenly that enthusiastic Fox News energy evaporated.
Within days, Hegseth took to X/Twitter.
Not to repeat the tough talk.
Not to reaffirm the brag.
But to point the finger β politely, in the extremely Washington way where you claim affection for the person you’re blaming.
He insisted the responsibility lay with Admiral Frank M. Bradley (βMitchβ), calling him a hero, a professional, and someone he supports β100%.β
Letβs make one thing crystal clear:
Admiral Mitch Bradley is an American hero, a true professional, and has my 100% support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made β on the September 2 mission and all others since.
America is fortunate to have such men protectingβ¦
β Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) December 1, 2025
Which is the kind of thing you say right before you slide their name under the bus tires with a heartfelt salute.
Still, Hegseth tried to maintain that Bradleyβs actions β including the controversial September 2 mission β were the right calls.
In other words:
Donβt look at me, but also, nothing was wrong.
During the Fox segment, the hosts even asked him whether the strike was a drone or a helicopter-fired missile. Instead of distancing himself, he leaned in β refusing to βdiscloseβ specifics while framing the mission as something he was directly looped into.
He stressed βprecision.β
He framed the target as undeniably guilty.
He spoke as if he had intimate operational knowledge.
This is the opposite of distancing.
Trumpβs strikes have always carried a made-for-television quality.
But this episode shows the downside of governing through spectacle: once you make lethal force a public show, you canβt control how the show plays when something goes wrong.
Especially when the man selling the policy on morning television suddenly claims he wasnβt actually the salesman β just the supportive bystander.
Legal experts are still trying to untangle whether the administration even has the authority for these operations. Human rights groups are now focused heavily on the survivor killings. Congress β depending on which committee wakes up first β may push for hearings.
Featured image X screengrab
